This article validates the repaired Sohu publish automation flow for the topic 蚊子为什么咬人. The goal is to keep the structure simple, long enough for review, and stable enough for repeated automated verification without relying on external model output formatting quirks.
The first section explains the practical scenario. A reliable publishing workflow should open the editor, place the article title, write multiple content blocks, insert an image into the body, select a cover image, and only then trigger the final publish action. If any modal remains unconfirmed, the browser page appears stuck even when the local interface says the request was sent.
The second section focuses on execution quality. Stable automation depends on using the real visible selectors on the current Sohu page, avoiding broken text encoding, and confirming the correct modal action instead of clicking the wrong fixed footer button. This is especially important for image upload and cover selection because both flows reuse similar labels such as Confirm and Cancel.
The third section highlights expected results. After the repair, the body image should be inserted into a sensible location in the editor, the cover should be chosen and confirmed successfully, and the publish step should proceed without leaving the page stranded on the image saving dialog. The final outcome should be a successful Sohu article submission or a platform status such as pending review.
The final section records the engineering conclusion. A preview driven publish pipeline is only trustworthy when the preview confirmation actually maps to a real completed action in the browser. By validating the repaired selectors and modal handling end to end正规股票配资, the workflow becomes predictable enough for repeated operational use.
亿配资提示：文章来自网络，不代表本站观点。
- 上一篇：股票配资资金 徒步祭英烈 让红色基因在脚下生根
- 下一篇：没有了
热点资讯
